Validation Rules
Canonical validity rules for protocol participation
This reference defines the active validation posture used to determine whether participation is complete, contextual, and structurally conformant.
Status
Draft v0.1 canonical reference
Role
Defines the active structural validation model for protocol participation.
Use
Use this page when evaluating admissibility and conformance under the current protocol.
Validation posture
A participation act must be complete, contextual, and conformant
Validation determines whether a participation act is structurally admissible under the active rule model. It does not determine whether the claim itself is true.
Completeness
Checks whether required references and structural fields are present.
References
Checks whether participants, context, and protocol-relevant material are recognizable.
Lifecycle fit
Checks whether the participation act fits the active lifecycle context and attempted move.
Conformance
Checks whether the interaction follows the active protocol rules rather than a local convention.
Boundary note
Validation is structural and does not decide factual correctness
This surface governs structural admissibility. It does not decide whether a disputed claim is true or whether a contested result should prevail.
What this surface governs
Structural validity, completeness, context fit, and protocol conformance.
What remains outside this surface
Truth assessment, result merit, and governed decision resolution.